ITAT Chandigarh: No Penalty under Section 272A(2)(k) due to Reasonable Cause

The ITAT Chandigarh allowed the appeal, ruling that no penalty under section 272A(2)(k) was leviable due to the reasonable cause shown by the assessee. The tribunal found that the delay in filing the TDS returns was not due to contumacious conduct but rather a genuine misunderstanding regarding TDS responsibilities. The penalty was directed to be deleted, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed.

---

---

Issues:
- Appeal against penalty imposed under section 272A(2)(k) for late filing of TDS returns.

Analysis:
1. The appeal was filed against the penalty imposed under section 272A(2)(k) of the Income Tax Act for late filing of TDS returns for the assessment year 2012-13. The jurisdictional Assessing Officer observed a significant delay in filing the quarterly TDS statements by the assessee, ranging from 660 to 945 days beyond the due dates specified in the Act.

2. The assessee contended that the delay was due to the transition of TDS responsibilities from PCDA WC, Chandigarh to the assessee. The assessee claimed that they were only informed to obtain separate TAN, DDO Registration No., and other details on 27.03.2012, and they believed that PCDA WC was handling the TDS filings until they received a notice from ITO (IDS), Patiala.

3. The Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, TDS, Chandigarh, rejected the assessee's explanation and levied a penalty of Rs. 1,61,390 under section 272A(2)(k). The CIT(Appeals) upheld the penalty, stating that the delay showed a conscious disregard of statutory obligations.

4. The ITAT Chandigarh, after hearing both parties and reviewing the submissions, found merit in the assessee's contentions. The tribunal held that the assessee had demonstrated a reasonable cause for the delay in filing the TDS returns. It was noted that the assessee acted promptly upon receiving the notice from ITO-TDS and there was a genuine belief that PCDA WC was handling the TDS compliance.

5. Consequently, the ITAT Chandigarh allowed the appeal, ruling that no penalty under section 272A(2)(k) was leviable due to the reasonable cause shown by the assessee. The tribunal emphasized that the delay was not due to any contumacious conduct but rather a genuine misunderstanding regarding TDS responsibilities. Hence, the penalty was directed to be deleted, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed.

---