Tribunal dismisses appeal due to delay in filing, citing Customs Act, 1962, and precedent.

The Tribunal upheld the impugned order, dismissing the appeal due to a delay of 208 days in filing, ruling that the Commissioner (Appeals) lacked authority to condone delays beyond the statutory limit of 30 days as per Section 128 of the Customs Act, 1962. The appellant's request for condonation of the delay was rejected, citing the precedent set in Singh Enterprises Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise. The appeal was dismissed, and the early hearing application was disposed of accordingly.

---

---

Issues:
- Condonation of delay in filing appeal before Commissioner (Appeals)
- Authority of Commissioner (Appeals) to condone delay beyond statutory limit

Analysis:
The appellant filed an application for early hearing seeking to hear the appeal out-of-turn. The appellant's General Manager argued that two rebate claims were dismissed as time-barred by the adjudicating authority. One appeal was filed within time, and the other had a delay of 208 days due to mismanagement. The appellant requested condonation of the delay by the Commissioner (Appeals) to accept the appeal.

The respondent supported the dismissal of the appeal by the Commissioner (Appeals) due to exceeding the condonable period. Referring to the judgment in Singh Enterprises Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, it was argued that the delay of 208 days could not be condoned beyond the statutory limit of 30 days.

After hearing both sides, the Tribunal found the issue covered by the Supreme Court's decision in Singh Enterprises. The Tribunal ruled that the Commissioner (Appeals) lacked the authority to condone delays beyond the statutory limit of 30 days as per Section 128 of the Customs Act, 1962. Therefore, the impugned order was upheld, and the appeal was dismissed. The early hearing application was disposed of accordingly.

---