Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee's contributions to the Employees' Provident Fund created under section 63 of the U.P. Co-operative Societies Act, 1965, were allowable as business expenditure under section 37(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The fund claimed by the assessee was not a recognised provident fund within section 36(1)(iv) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Although section 63 of the U.P. Co-operative Societies Act, 1965 required a contributory provident fund for employees, the Tribunal found that the amounts credited to the fund remained invested in the assessee's business and formed part of its assets. The securities were not separately allocated to the provident fund, the fund was not kept distinct from the society's business assets, and the requirements that the fund should not be used in the business and should not form part of the assets of the society were not satisfied.
Conclusion: The contribution was not expenditure laid out wholly and exclusively for the purposes of the assessee's business and was not deductible under section 37(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Ratio Decidendi: A contribution to a purported provident fund is not deductible as business expenditure where the fund is not established and maintained as a separate statutory fund and continues to remain part of the assessee's business assets.