Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2018 (9) TMI 411 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal rules in favor of appellant, orders fresh assessment emphasizing cooperation and fair judgment The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant on multiple issues, including the improper application of an 8% profit rate post rejection of books under ...
                          Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                              Tribunal rules in favor of appellant, orders fresh assessment emphasizing cooperation and fair judgment

                              The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant on multiple issues, including the improper application of an 8% profit rate post rejection of books under section 145. It directed a fresh assessment emphasizing the need for reasonable judgment and the assessee's cooperation. The Tribunal also ordered the restoration of returned business profits, vacating ad hoc assessments, ensuring compliance with principles of natural justice, and correcting the separate assessment of interest income. Overall, the Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, stressing the importance of a fair and well-founded assessment process.




                              Issues:
                              1. Application of arbitrary profit rate post rejection of books under section 145
                              2. Restoration of returned business profits
                              3. Vacating ad hoc assessment made by Assessing Officer
                              4. Compliance with principles of natural justice in passing ex-parte orders
                              5. Separate assessment of interest income from other sources

                              Analysis:

                              Issue 1: Application of arbitrary profit rate post rejection of books under section 145

                              The assessee challenged the application of an 8% profit rate on declared receipts post rejection of books under section 145. The Assessing Officer (AO) made a best judgment assessment due to the assessee's failure to furnish details or produce books of account. The AO assessed the profit at Rs. 95,83,090 on declared gross receipts of Rs. 11,97,88,637, representing 8% on a presumptive basis as per section 44AD. The appellant contended that the accounts were audited, and the profit rate of 8% was unjustified, citing a previous assessment where a lower profit rate was applied. The Tribunal found the application of section 44AD by the authorities improper given the volume of receipts and audit reports submitted. It held that the best judgment assessment should have a reasonable basis and directed the matter back to the AO for a fresh assessment, emphasizing the need for the assessee's full cooperation.

                              Issue 2: Restoration of returned business profits

                              The appellant sought the restoration of returned business profits, contending that the profits were reasonable and contemporaneous at 4.26% of declared receipts. However, the AO and CIT(A) upheld the higher profit assessment due to the assessee's non-cooperation and lack of supporting documentation. The Tribunal acknowledged the need for a fair assessment based on merits and directed the AO to reevaluate the profits after providing the assessee with another opportunity to present their case with supporting evidence.

                              Issue 3: Vacating ad hoc assessment made by Assessing Officer

                              The appellant challenged the ad hoc and arbitrary assessment made by the AO without adequate analysis. The Tribunal noted the lack of cooperation from the assessee in providing necessary details or attending hearings, leading to the affirmation of the AO's order by the CIT(A). However, it emphasized the importance of a well-founded assessment and directed the AO to conduct a fresh assessment with the assessee's full cooperation.

                              Issue 4: Compliance with principles of natural justice in passing ex-parte orders

                              Both the AO and CIT(A) were criticized for passing ex-parte orders without adhering to principles of natural justice. The Tribunal highlighted the significance of allowing the assessee a fair opportunity to present their case and directed the AO to ensure due process in the reassessment proceedings.

                              Issue 5: Separate assessment of interest income from other sources

                              The authorities erred in separately assessing business interest income already declared under other sources. The Tribunal emphasized the need for assessments to align with legal provisions and directed a reevaluation of the interest income treatment to ensure compliance with applicable laws.

                              In conclusion, the Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, emphasizing the importance of a fair and well-founded assessment process based on cooperation, evidence, and legal provisions.
                              Full Summary is available for active users!
                              Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                              Topics

                              ActsIncome Tax
                              No Records Found