TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Resolution of Tax Credit Disputes: Court Ensures Fair Process, Access to Remedies</h1> <h3>SARE REALTY PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED, DOTCOM HOME FASHIONS PVT LTD., TARA CHAND SALUJA & SONS, VEE GEE AUTO COMPONENTS PVT. LTD., ANKUR OIL & REFRIGERATION, M/s TARA CHAND SALUJA & COMPANY, M/s ALLIANCE GRAPHIC EQUIPMENT PRIVATE LIMITED, M/s BATRA ART PRESS, BENLON INDIA LTD., FRV POWER INDIA PVT. LTD., AMAN MOTORS Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.</h3> SARE REALTY PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED, DOTCOM HOME FASHIONS PVT LTD., TARA CHAND SALUJA & SONS, VEE GEE AUTO COMPONENTS PVT. LTD., ANKUR OIL & ... Issues:1. Grievance mechanism for cases related to CENVAT and VAT credit or credit on stock-in-trade.2. Resolution of cases where assessees faced technical glitches in uploading data.3. Petitioners' right to challenge final determination and constitutional vires if necessary.Analysis:1. The judgment addresses the grievance mechanism established by the Union of India to handle cases where assessees encountered difficulties in uploading data to claim CENVAT and VAT credit or credit on stock-in-trade. The Court notes that Circular No. 39/13/2018-GST, issued on 3rd April 2018, outlines the resolution process for such cases. It is highlighted that out of 17,000 cases, approximately 13,000 have been resolved satisfactorily. The Union of India assures that in instances where assessees faced technical glitches or other issues preventing data upload, appropriate benefits are provided. The Court acknowledges that the petitioners' case is also under consideration through the grievance redressal mechanism. Furthermore, it is emphasized that if any claim or representation is rejected, a detailed speaking order with reasons will be issued to the concerned petitioner.2. The petitioners' legal counsel confirm that they have already submitted a representation to the respondent authorities under the grievance mechanism and intend to pursue this remedy. They also seek the liberty to challenge any final determination if they are dissatisfied with the outcome. Additionally, the petitioners reserve their right to challenge the constitutional validity of any decision if deemed necessary. In light of these submissions, the Court disposes of the writ petitions based on the statements made by the parties. The judgment clarifies that no comments have been made on the merits of the case and no costs are awarded in this matter.3. The Court's decision underscores the importance of the grievance redressal mechanism in resolving issues related to CENVAT and VAT credit, ensuring that assessees facing technical challenges receive due consideration and benefits. By allowing petitioners the liberty to challenge final determinations and constitutional validity if required, the judgment upholds the principles of procedural fairness and access to legal remedies. The Court's focus on the effective implementation of the grievance mechanism reflects a commitment to addressing taxpayer concerns and ensuring a transparent and accountable tax administration process.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
