Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether reversal of an amount earlier allowed as a deduction could be treated as a benefit arising by remission or cessation of liability under section 41(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The applicable principle, drawn from the corresponding provision in section 10(2A) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, is that the statutory benefit is attracted only when there is a remission or cessation of liability. A mere transfer of entry or reversal of an accounting entry is a unilateral act and does not, by itself, extinguish the debtor's liability. On the facts, the amount reversed in the profit and loss account could not be treated as a benefit within section 41(1).
Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.
Final Conclusion: The reference sought by the Revenue was not called for, and the Tribunal's view was upheld.
Ratio Decidendi: For the purposes of section 41(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, a taxable benefit arises only on an actual remission or cessation of liability, and a unilateral accounting reversal does not amount to such cessation.