Tribunal overturns demand for unrecovered freight charges, cites Ispat Industries ruling

The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by M.s Gokulanand Petrofibres, overturning the confirmation of demand and penalties imposed for the allegedly unrecovered freight amount not reflected in the invoices. The Tribunal held that the charges for returning empty vehicles from the buyer's premises, although not included in the invoices, should not be part of the assessable value of goods as they were unrelated to the manufacturing process. The Tribunal distinguished previous decisions cited by the Assistant Commissioner, emphasizing the relevance of the Hon'ble Apex Court's ruling in Ispat Industries (2015).

---

---

Issues:
Confirmation of demand and imposition of penalties regarding the recovery of certain freight amount not shown in invoices.

Analysis:
The appellant, M.s Gokulanand Petrofibres, filed appeals against the confirmation of demand and penalties imposed due to the alleged recovery of a freight amount not reflected in their invoices. The appellant's counsel argued that the freight amount in question, which was not included in the invoices but shown in the balance sheet, pertained to charges for returning empty vehicles from the buyer's premises. It was contended that these freight charges should not be considered as part of the assessable value, citing the decision of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Ispat Industries (2015). The argument emphasized that these charges for returning empty vehicles were unrelated to the manufacturing process and should not be included in the assessable value of goods.

The Assistant Commissioner (AR) relied on the impugned order and cited several decisions in support of the respondent's position, including Tripty Drinks Pvt. Ltd. vs. C.C.E., Bhubaneshwar-I (2002), Tripty Drinks Pvt. Ltd. vs. Commissioner (2003), and Saraswati Air Products Ltd. vs. CCE, Meerut (2009). However, upon reviewing the submissions from both parties, the Tribunal found that the recovered amounts were for returning empty trucks from the buyer's premises and were not related to the manufacturing activity. Furthermore, as these charges were essentially freight charges, they were not to be included in the assessable value, in line with the precedent set by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Ispat Industries. The Tribunal noted that the decisions cited by the AR were from a period prior to the Ispat Industries case and therefore did not hold relevance anymore. Consequently, the appeals were allowed, and the decision was pronounced in open court on 01.08.2018.

---