Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the disallowance of employees' contribution to PF and ESI under section 36(1)(va) read with section 2(24)(x) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was sustainable, and whether the matter required fresh adjudication in light of the Tribunal's prior view on the relevant due date.
Analysis: The assessee did not dispute the binding jurisdictional High Court decision upholding disallowance where employees' contribution is not credited within the due date prescribed under the relevant welfare enactments. However, reliance was placed on the Tribunal's earlier view that, on identical facts, the question of delay may require examination with reference to the month of actual payment of wages, and the issue was restored to the Assessing Officer for verification. Following that coordinate bench view, the Tribunal held that the controversy could not be finally resolved on the present record and required fresh consideration by the Assessing Officer in accordance with law.
Conclusion: The disallowance issue was restored to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication, and the assessee obtained only statistical relief.