Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the amount collected by the assessee as central excise duty on goods not liable to duty was recoverable under Section 11D of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and whether the Tribunal was justified in holding otherwise.
Analysis: The goods in question were held by the adjudicating authority to be outside the scope of manufacture under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 for the relevant period, and therefore no excise duty was payable on their clearance. On that basis, the amount recovered from customers as duty could not be treated as lawfully collected duty. The adjudicating authority had also held that the credit-utilisation position did not defeat the operation of Section 11D, because the amount had been collected from buyers as excise duty and remained payable to the Central Government. The High Court found the Tribunal's contrary conclusion to be inconsistent with the record and the adjudication order.
Conclusion: The demand under Section 11D was sustainable and the Tribunal's view rejecting it was unsustainable.
Final Conclusion: The impugned order of the Tribunal was set aside and the matters were remanded for fresh decision.
Ratio Decidendi: Amounts collected from customers as excise duty in respect of goods not liable to duty are recoverable under Section 11D of the Central Excise Act, 1944.