Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Cenvat credit was admissible on iron and steel items used for fabrication of supporting structures for self-manufactured capital goods and for laying foundations.
Analysis: The Tribunal applied the user test and followed the principle that structural steel used in the fabrication of support structures for capital goods can qualify as part of capital goods and therefore attract Cenvat credit under Rule 2(a) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. It distinguished such use from steel items used merely for laying foundations, for which credit was not available. Since the dispute involved interpretation of the relevant credit provisions, the penalty was not sustained.
Conclusion: Cenvat credit was allowed on steel items used for supporting structures for self-manufactured capital goods, but denied on steel items used for laying foundations; the penalty was set aside.
Final Conclusion: The impugned order was modified to restrict disallowance to foundation-related steel items, with consequential re-quantification of the demand and deletion of penalty.
Ratio Decidendi: Structural steel used to fabricate supporting structures for capital goods may qualify for Cenvat credit as part of capital goods when the user test is satisfied, but steel used only for laying foundations does not.