Tribunal affirms capital gains calculation, rejects segregation by year; allows partial post-sale expenditure claim.

The tribunal upheld the computation of capital gains based on the total consideration of Rs. 18,31,00,000/- from a slump sale, rejecting the assessee's argument to segregate the amount based on the year of receipt. The tribunal also partially allowed the claim for expenditure incurred post slump sale, directing the Assessing Officer to allow Rs. 7,61,585/- out of the total claim of Rs. 10,41,749/-. The appeal was partly allowed, and the order was pronounced on 19th July 2018 in Chennai.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Computation of capital gains on slump sale.
2. Allowance of expenditure incurred by the assessee post slump sale.

Issue-Wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Computation of Capital Gains on Slump Sale:

The primary grievance of the assessee was that the entire sale consideration of Rs. 18,31,00,000/- arising from a slump sale was taken as income for the impugned assessment year. The assessee contended that only Rs. 16,02,00,000/- was received during the relevant financial year, with the remaining Rs. 2,29,00,000/- received in the subsequent financial year. The assessee argued that the balance amount was kept in an escrow account and could only be encashed upon fulfilling certain obligations, thus should not be considered for capital gains in the impugned year.

The tribunal examined the slump sale agreement and the escrow agreement. It was noted that the consideration was clearly mentioned as Rs. 18,31,00,000/- in the slump sale agreement, and the conditions for the escrow account were detailed. The tribunal held that the total consideration for the slump sale was Rs. 18,31,00,000/-, and segregating it into parts payable in different years did not affect the computation of capital gains. The tribunal emphasized that Section 50B of the Income Tax Act, 1961, mandates that profits or gains from a slump sale are chargeable to tax in the year the transfer took place, and there is no provision allowing the segregation of consideration based on the year of receipt.

The tribunal also reviewed relevant case laws cited by the assessee but found them inapplicable to the present case. Consequently, the tribunal upheld the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), dismissing the assessee's ground on this issue.

2. Allowance of Expenditure Incurred Post Slump Sale:

The second issue involved the disallowance of expenditure amounting to Rs. 10,41,749/- claimed by the assessee. The assessee argued that these expenses were necessary to maintain its corporate structure post the slump sale. The Assessing Officer had disallowed the entire expenditure, reasoning that there was no business activity after the slump sale. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) allowed the claim on a pro-rata basis for six days, considering the slump sale agreement date of 06.04.2011.

The tribunal reviewed the nature of the disallowed expenses, which included manufacturing expenses, employee benefits, finance costs, and administrative expenses. The tribunal agreed with the lower authorities that manufacturing expenses incurred post slump sale could not be justified. However, it held that expenses related to employee benefits, finance costs, and administrative expenses were necessary for maintaining the company's corporate status and should not have been disallowed. The tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to allow Rs. 7,61,585/- out of the total claim, sustaining the balance disallowance.

Conclusion:

The appeal was partly allowed, with the tribunal upholding the computation of capital gains based on the total consideration of Rs. 18,31,00,000/- and partly allowing the claim for expenditure incurred post slump sale. The order was pronounced on 19th July 2018 at Chennai.

---