Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2018 (7) TMI 1546 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Assessee's Appeal Dismissed, Revenue's Partially Allowed | TP Adjustment Remitted for Further Study The appeal of the assessee was dismissed, and the appeal of the Revenue was partly allowed for statistical purposes. The Tribunal remitted the issue of TP ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Assessee's Appeal Dismissed, Revenue's Partially Allowed | TP Adjustment Remitted for Further Study

                          The appeal of the assessee was dismissed, and the appeal of the Revenue was partly allowed for statistical purposes. The Tribunal remitted the issue of TP adjustment back to the Assessing Officer for further study by the TPO, while upholding the disallowance of notional interest and supporting the classification of renovation expenses as revenue expenditure.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Treatment of foreign exchange loss in determining the Arm's Length Price (ALP).
                          2. Disallowance of notional interest on borrowings for capital work in progress under section 36(1)(iii).
                          3. Determination of ALP for international transactions with associated enterprises.
                          4. Classification of expenditure incurred on renovation of leasehold premises as revenue or capital expenditure.

                          Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Treatment of Foreign Exchange Loss in Determining the ALP:

                          The Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) treated foreign exchange loss as part of operating cost for determining the profit margin to establish the ALP of international transactions. The assessee argued that the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) had accepted their argument and excluded the foreign exchange loss from operating costs, following the principle of consistency. The assessee contended that the Safe Harbour Rules, which do not consider foreign exchange loss/gain as part of operating cost/income, should have been followed. However, this issue was not pressed by the assessee before the Tribunal, and thus, it was dismissed as not pressed.

                          2. Disallowance of Notional Interest on Borrowings for Capital Work in Progress:

                          The Assessing Officer disallowed Rs. 92,28,405/- as notional interest on working capital loans, treating it as incurred for the acquisition of assets and disallowed it under the proviso to section 36(1)(iii) of the Act. The assessee argued that the interest was for improvements to leasehold properties and not for acquiring capital assets. They cited an earlier Tribunal order and a High Court judgment which held that such expenditure was revenue in nature. However, the Tribunal noted the absence of evidence that the capital work in progress was related to leasehold property renovations and upheld the disallowance. The Tribunal also noted that the assessee failed to substantiate that no interest-bearing funds were used for capital work in progress, leading to the dismissal of this ground of appeal.

                          3. Determination of ALP for International Transactions with Associated Enterprises:

                          The TPO had determined a TP adjustment of Rs. 3,69,19,518/- to the value of international transactions. The DRP upheld some of the additions proposed in the draft assessment order. The Revenue's appeal challenged the DRP's decision to fix the average mark-up for companies engaged in distribution of jewellery at 2.18% instead of (-) 0.02% determined by the TPO. The Tribunal found the TPO's method of balancing figures without proper TP study inappropriate and remitted the issue back to the Assessing Officer to refer the matter afresh to the TPO for further TP study and decision.

                          4. Classification of Expenditure Incurred on Renovation of Leasehold Premises:

                          The Revenue's appeal also contested the DRP's decision to treat the expenditure on renovation of leasehold premises as revenue expenditure. The Tribunal referred to a Jurisdictional High Court decision in the assessee's own case, which held that such expenditure is revenue in nature. Following this precedent, the Tribunal decided the issue in favor of the assessee, dismissing the Revenue's ground of appeal on this matter.

                          Conclusion:

                          The appeal of the assessee was dismissed, and the appeal of the Revenue was partly allowed for statistical purposes. The Tribunal remitted the issue of TP adjustment back to the Assessing Officer for further study by the TPO, while upholding the disallowance of notional interest and supporting the classification of renovation expenses as revenue expenditure. The order was pronounced in the open Court on April 10, 2018.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found