Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the intermediate products emerging in the manufacture of particle boards were classifiable as primary resin falling under Chapter 39 and, if not, whether duty could be demanded by denying the area-based exemption under Notification No. 50/2003-CE.
Analysis: The Tribunal followed its earlier decision in the appellant's own case on the identical facts and applied the same reasoning that the product emerging from the process was prepared glue meant for direct use in bonding, and not resin in primary form. It relied on the process adopted, the controlled manufacture, the addition of hardener, and Chapter Note 6 read with the HSN explanatory material to hold that the product could not be placed in the negative list under Chapter 39. On that basis, denial of the area-based exemption was found unsustainable.
Conclusion: The demand of duty on the intermediate products was not sustainable and the appeal succeeded in favour of the assessee.