Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the intermediate products emerging in the manufacture of laminates and boards were classifiable as primary resins under Chapter 39 and therefore outside the area-based exemption, or as prepared glues and adhesives under heading 3506 and eligible for exemption.
Analysis: The Tribunal followed its earlier decisions on identical facts and held that the products emerging from the reactor/kettle were not primary resins in the sense contemplated by Chapter 39. The processes showed that the material was prepared for direct use as glue in the bonding section, with hardener and other inputs added to obtain quick bonding properties and reduced shelf life. Reliance placed by the Revenue on test reports was not accepted in view of the deficiencies noted in those reports and the absence of proper analysis of the manufacturing process. The HSN exclusion note also supported classification outside Chapter 39. Since the goods were prepared glues or adhesives, denial of the area-based exemption was unsustainable.
Conclusion: The goods were not liable to duty as Chapter 39 resins and were eligible for the claimed exemption; the demand was set aside in favour of the assessee.