Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the construction of Rajkiya Ashram Padhdhati Vidyalaya for a State undertaking was commercial construction liable to service tax under the head Works Contract, and whether the consequential penalties could survive.
Analysis: The construction was for a residential school intended to provide education to orphaned, Scheduled Caste, Scheduled Tribe, extremely backward and economically weaker students. On the admitted facts, the facility was meant for educational and welfare purposes, not for commerce or industry. The classification adopted by the Commissioner proceeded on the premise that the parties were commercial concerns, but the nature of the construction and its end use were determinative for taxability. Since the school construction did not answer the description of commercial or industrial construction, the levy under the Works Contract head could not be sustained. Once the tax demand failed, the penalties imposed under the connected provisions also could not survive.
Conclusion: The construction was not taxable as commercial or industrial construction under the Works Contract head, and the demand of service tax and all penalties were set aside in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Construction of an educational facility meant for welfare-oriented residential schooling, and not for commerce or industry, does not fall within commercial or industrial construction for service tax purposes.