TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Court excludes Bodhtree Consulting Ltd. as comparable in Transfer Pricing case; orders examination of Related Party Transactions.</h1> <h3>The Pr. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, CIT (A) And The Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax Circle-11 (1) Versus M/s. Analog Devices India Pvt. Ltd.</h3> The Court upheld the exclusion of M/s. Bodhtree Consulting Ltd. as a comparable in a Transfer Pricing case, finding no perversity in the Tribunal's ... TPA - Comparable selection - substantial question of law - Held that:- This Court in Prl.Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr. Vs. M/s.Softbrands India Pvt. Ltd. (2018 (6) TMI 1327 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ) has held that in these type of findings of the learned Tribunal remained final fact findings of the learned Tribunal and are binding on the lower authorities of the Department as well as this Court and unless an established ex-facie perversity is found in the findings of the learned Tribunal, the appeal u/s.260A of the Act is not maintainable. Issues:1. Transfer Pricing - Exclusion of comparables2. Transfer Pricing - Remand for RPT filter examination3. Operating Revenue - Treatment of foreign exchange gainIssue 1 - Transfer Pricing - Exclusion of comparables:The appeal under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was filed by the Appellants-Revenue challenging the order of the ITAT, Bangalore Bench 'A' regarding Transfer Pricing Adjustments for A.Y. 2009-10. The Tribunal excluded M/s. Bodhtree Consulting Ltd. from the list of comparables, stating it is functionally different from the assessee. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer/TPO to exclude the company from the final list of comparables based on a similar decision in the case of Cisco Systems (India) Pvt. Ltd. The Court held that unless there is an established perversity in the Tribunal's findings, the appeal under section 260A is not maintainable. The Court found no such perversity in the Tribunal's findings and upheld the exclusion of M/s. Bodhtree Consulting Ltd. as a comparable.Issue 2 - Transfer Pricing - Remand for RPT filter examination:The Tribunal remanded the issue of comparability of M/s. SIP Technologies & Export Ltd. back to the TPO for examination of the Related Party Transactions (RPT) filter. The Tribunal found discrepancies in the information used by the TPO to conclude RPT in excess of 25% for the company. The Court ordered a factual examination and verification of the RPT issue by the TPO, in line with the decision in another case where a company was excluded from comparables for having RPT in excess of 15%. The Court upheld the Tribunal's decision for a proper examination of the RPT filter for M/s. SIP Technologies & Export Ltd.Issue 3 - Operating Revenue - Treatment of foreign exchange gain:The Tribunal held that foreign exchange gain on realization of consideration for rendering software development services should be regarded as part of operating revenues. Citing a previous decision, the Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer/TPO to verify if the foreign exchange gain is on account of realization of consideration and consider it as operating in nature. The Court concurred with the Tribunal's decision, upholding the treatment of foreign exchange gain as part of operating revenues. The Court dismissed the appeal by the Appellants-Revenue, stating that no substantial question of law arose in the case.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
