Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the payment described as an affiliation fee was royalty under section 9(1)(vi) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and Article 12(3) of the India-USA DTAA, so as to require deduction of tax at source and attract disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The payment was found to be only an annual affiliation fee for association with the foreign entity. It did not involve transfer of technology, imparting of technical knowledge, use of copyright, or use of any industrial, commercial or scientific equipment. The agreement also contemplated a separate consulting-and-reports fee, but that was not the payment in dispute. As the foreign recipient had no permanent establishment in India and the amount was not chargeable as royalty under either the domestic law or the treaty, the obligation to deduct tax at source did not arise.
Conclusion: The affiliation fee was not royalty and no disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) was warranted. The issue was decided in favour of the assessee.