Tariff classification of crude palmolein follows the tariff text, while delayed testing cannot defeat concessional duty eligibility.

Tariff classification of imported crude palmolein must follow the tariff entry, chapter notes and HSN Explanatory Notes, and cannot be altered by exemption conditions in a notification. On that basis, the goods were treated as crude oil under Heading 1511 10 00 rather than as other than crude oil. For concessional duty, the relevant question was the condition of the goods at import; delayed testing showing reduced beta carotene content could not override the contemporaneous character of the goods. On the record, the import remained crude palmolein, and the concessional rate was available.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether imported crude palmolein was classifiable under Heading 1511 10 00 as crude oil or under Heading 1511 90 90 as other than crude oil. (ii) Whether the importer was entitled to the concessional rate of duty under Notification No. 21/2002-Cus. as amended.

Issue (i): Whether imported crude palmolein was classifiable under Heading 1511 10 00 as crude oil or under Heading 1511 90 90 as other than crude oil.

Analysis: Classification had to be determined from the tariff heading, chapter notes, section notes and HSN Explanatory Notes, and not by importing the exemption notification criteria into tariff classification. The imported goods were crude palmolein of edible grade, and the record did not show any refining or other process that would take them out of the description of crude oil. The Board circular and the exemption notification could restrict the scope of exemption, but could not enlarge or narrow the tariff description for classification purposes.

Conclusion: The goods were correctly classifiable under Heading 1511 10 00 as crude oil.

Issue (ii): Whether the importer was entitled to the concessional rate of duty under Notification No. 21/2002-Cus. as amended.

Analysis: The benefit of the notification depended on the nature of the goods at import, and the Tribunal found that beta carotene content diminishes over time. The samples were tested long after import, and the delayed test result could not displace the evidence that the goods were crude palmolein at the time of import. In the absence of reliable contrary evidence showing that the goods were refined palm oil, the denial of the concession could not be sustained.

Conclusion: The importer was entitled to the concessional rate of duty under the notification.

Final Conclusion: The classification adopted by the lower authority was set aside, the duty demand did not survive, and the appeal succeeded with consequential relief.

Ratio Decidendi: Tariff classification must be based on the tariff entry, chapter notes and HSN Explanatory Notes, and an exemption notification cannot be used to alter the scope of the tariff heading; where the goods remain crude palmolein at import, delayed testing cannot justify denial of the notified concession.

---