Appeal dismissed on disallowance under sec. 14A without exempt income.

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal by the Revenue and the Cross Objections by the assessee, affirming the CIT(A)'s order regarding the disallowance under sec. 14A r.w.rule 8D due to the absence of exempt income during the assessment year. The Tribunal held that unless there is actual receipt of exempt income, section 14A should not be invoked, emphasizing that no disallowance can be made in a year without exempt income.

---

---

Issues:
- Disallowance under sec. 14A r.w.rule 8D
- Computation of disallowance u/s 14A r.w.r. 8D
- Applicability of section 14A in absence of exempt income

Analysis:

Issue 1: Disallowance under sec. 14A r.w.rule 8D
The appeal filed by the Revenue and the Cross Objections by the assessee pertain to the Assessment Year 2012-13 and challenge the order passed by the ld. CIT(A)-12, Mumbai. The Revenue contends that the disallowance under sec. 14A should not have been deleted by the CIT(A) despite the absence of exempt income, citing a CBDT circular. The assessee, on the other hand, argues that the disallowance was incorrectly computed by the Assessing Officer under Rule 8D. The Tribunal notes that both parties have been heard together due to identical issues.

Issue 2: Computation of disallowance u/s 14A r.w.r. 8D
The Assessing Officer computed the disallowance under Rule 8D to be Rs. 1,85,38,029, based on interest expenses and administrative expenses. The CIT(A) reversed this decision, emphasizing the absence of exempt income during the assessment year, thereby negating the application of sec. 14A r.w.r 8D. The Tribunal concurs with the CIT(A) and holds that unless there is actual receipt of exempt income, section 14A should not be invoked. It relies on case law to support this position, emphasizing that no disallowance can be made in a year without exempt income.

Issue 3: Applicability of section 14A in absence of exempt income
The Tribunal further clarifies that section 14A is triggered only when there is exempt income, and the disallowance should not be made without such income. It highlights the principle that the expression 'does not form part of total income' in section 14A necessitates actual receipt of income not included in the total income for disallowing related expenditure. Relying on precedent, the Tribunal upholds the CIT(A)'s decision, dismissing the Revenue's appeal.

In conclusion, the Tribunal dismisses the appeal by the Revenue and the Cross Objections by the assessee, affirming the CIT(A)'s order regarding the disallowance under sec. 14A r.w.rule 8D due to the absence of exempt income during the assessment year.

---