Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Notification No. 118/75 dated 30 April 1975 extended exemption to steam manufactured in one factory of the same manufacturer and used in another factory of the same manufacturer, and whether non-compliance with Chapter X of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 affected the claim.
Analysis: The notification exempted goods falling under Item No. 68 of the First Schedule to the Central Excises & Salt Act, 1944 when manufactured in a factory and intended for use in that factory or in any other factory of the same manufacturer. The steam generated in the sugar factory was used in the distillery of the same assessee, so the substantive condition of the notification was satisfied. The challenge based on Chapter X was not pressed before the Tribunal and did not form the basis of the Tribunal's decision. On that footing, no substantial question of law arose.
Conclusion: The exemption was rightly available to the assessee, and the challenge failed.