Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to transfer the duty-paid credit lying in the set-off register to the Modvat account under the transitional provisions of Rule 57H(1), and consequently to cash refund of the admissible credit amount.
Analysis: The amended Rule 57H(1) empowered the Assistant Collector to allow credit of duty paid on inputs lying in stock on 25 July 1991 or received on or after that date, provided no credit had already been taken under any other rule or notification. The inputs in question were admittedly lying in stock on the relevant date, the required declaration had been filed, and the input duty was identifiable from the records. The use of the input in the manufacture of the final product was covered under the Modvat scheme, and the denial of credit proceeded on an incorrect understanding of the applicable transitional provision. In view of the statutory direction for disposal of pending proceedings relating to Cenvat credit under the existing law, the admissible credit was liable to be refunded in cash.
Conclusion: The denial of Modvat credit was set aside, and the appellant was held entitled to the disputed credit amount with consequential cash refund and applicable interest.