Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to the benefit of the Voluntary Compliance of Excise and Service Tax Scheme notwithstanding that an audit had been initiated and was pending on 01.03.2013, and whether the audit had to be confined only to the already registered services.
Analysis: Section 106(2) of the Finance Act, 2013 disqualifies a declarant where an inquiry, investigation, or audit has been initiated and is pending as on 01.03.2013. The condition in clause (b) operates independently of clause (a) and is not confined to a particular registered service. The clarification issued by the department, read strictly, does not support a narrow construction that would limit the pending audit to only the services already disclosed by the assessee. Once the audit had unearthed the unregistered renting of immovable property service and was pending on the cut-off date, the declaration was liable to be rejected. The scheme could not be invoked after the department had discovered the undisclosed service during the audit.
Conclusion: The appellant was not entitled to the scheme benefit, and the rejection of the declaration was justified.
Final Conclusion: The dismissal of the writ petition was correctly affirmed, and the appeal failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Under Section 106(2) of the Finance Act, 2013, a pending audit on the statutory cut-off date disqualifies a declaration under the voluntary compliance scheme, and the disqualification is not limited to audits concerning only already registered services.