Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether recovery proceedings initiated under the Revenue Recovery Act were barred by limitation under Section 41(4) of the Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1950, where the certificate under Section 41(3) had been issued within three years from the latest date fixed for payment under the demand notice.
Analysis: The limitation under Section 41(4) applies to the commencement of recovery proceedings, and the certificate issued under Section 41(3) is the step that sets such proceedings in motion. Once that certificate is issued within the prescribed period, subsequent recovery steps taken through the Revenue Recovery Act do not become time-barred merely because they are completed later. On the facts, the notice of demand followed the assessment, and the certificate was issued within three years of the relevant payment date. The later delay in actual recovery did not affect the validity of the initiation of recovery proceedings.
Conclusion: The limitation objection failed, and the challenge to the recovery orders was rejected.
Ratio Decidendi: For recovery under the Agricultural Income-tax Act, limitation is satisfied if the certificate commencing recovery is issued within the statutory period; later recovery through the Revenue Recovery Act may continue even after that period expires.