Tribunal rejects Revenue's turnover filter, upholds assessee's international transaction value adjustment deletion.

The Tribunal rejected the Revenue's appeal on the turnover filter and adjustments, allowing the assessee's appeal by deleting the international transaction value adjustment and upholding the deletion of raw material purchase inflation additions. The assessee's appeal was partly allowed, while the Revenue's appeal was dismissed.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Determination of arm's length price (ALP) of international transactions.
2. Adjustment of ALP recommended by the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO).
3. Application of turnover filter in selecting comparables.
4. Deletion of additions on account of inflation of purchase of raw materials.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Determination of Arm's Length Price (ALP) of International Transactions:
The primary issue in the cross-appeals by the Revenue and the assessee pertains to the determination of the arm's length price (ALP) of international transactions entered by the assessee with its associated enterprises (AE). The assessee used the Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) to determine the ALP, which was accepted by the TPO, including the selection of Schutz Dishman Biotech Ltd. as the tested party and the profit level indicator (PLI) of operative profit divided by operative cost (OP/OC).

2. Adjustment of ALP Recommended by the TPO:
The TPO recommended an upward adjustment of Rs. 4,10,40,877/- in the value of international transactions undertaken by the assessee. This recommendation was based on the selection of four comparables engaged in bulk drug manufacturing. The CIT(A) reduced the adjustment to Rs. 2,83,07,144/- by applying a turnover filter, which eliminated three of the four comparables selected by the TPO.

3. Application of Turnover Filter in Selecting Comparables:
The CIT(A) observed that a turnover filter is essential, and companies with sales in the range of Rs. 8 crores to Rs. 23 crores should be considered for comparison. This filter left only Gennex Laboratories Ltd. as a comparable. The Revenue contested this reduction, arguing against the application of the turnover filter. However, the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s application of the turnover filter, citing decisions from the Bombay and Delhi High Courts that support the relevance of turnover in comparability analysis.

4. Deletion of Additions on Account of Inflation of Purchase of Raw Materials:
The AO made additions of Rs. 1,43,79,263/- and Rs. 62,63,591/- on account of variations in the actual consumption of raw material compared to standard norms. The CIT(A) deleted these additions, following the Tribunal's orders for previous assessment years (2002-03 to 2006-07), which had similarly deleted such additions. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, finding no error in the deletion of these additions based on consistent past rulings.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal concluded by rejecting the grounds of appeal raised by the Revenue regarding the application of the turnover filter and the adjustments confirmed by the CIT(A). The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee by deleting the adjustment made in the value of international transactions and upheld the deletion of additions on account of inflation of purchase of raw materials. Thus, the appeal of the assessee was partly allowed, and the appeal of the Revenue was dismissed.

---