Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2018 (6) TMI 164 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Appeal allowed with directions for Transfer Pricing Officer & Dispute Resolution Panel on key issues The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, with directions for the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) and Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) to reconsider ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Appeal allowed with directions for Transfer Pricing Officer & Dispute Resolution Panel on key issues

                          The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, with directions for the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) and Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) to reconsider various issues. The Tribunal highlighted the importance of proper analysis in selecting comparables, making working capital adjustments, and calculating operating margins. The TPO was instructed to adequately consider the appellant's evidence and submissions, particularly in areas such as transfer pricing adjustments, selection of comparable companies, and disallowance of royalty payments and provisions for bad debts.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Transfer Pricing Adjustment
                          2. Selection of Comparable Companies
                          3. Working Capital Adjustment
                          4. Proportionate Adjustment for International Transactions
                          5. Calculation of Operating Margins
                          6. Disallowance of Royalty
                          7. Disallowance of Provision for Bad and Doubtful Debts

                          Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Transfer Pricing Adjustment:
                          The primary issue revolves around the enhancement of the appellant's income by Rs. 115,226,756 due to the Transfer Pricing (TP) adjustment under Section 92CA(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appellant argued that the TP adjustment was made without proper empirical evidence or sound analysis. The Tribunal found that the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) had not considered the appellant's submissions and evidences adequately, leading to an inappropriate benchmarking approach.

                          2. Selection of Comparable Companies:
                          The appellant initially identified 13 comparable companies, but the TPO rejected these and selected four different companies, later reducing them to three. The Tribunal noted that the TPO dismissed the appellant's comparables and objections summarily without proper reasoning. Consequently, the Tribunal restored the issue of selecting comparables to the TPO for fresh analysis, directing the TPO to consider the appellant's evidence and submissions properly.

                          3. Working Capital Adjustment:
                          The appellant sought a working capital adjustment to account for differences in working capital requirements between itself and the comparable companies. The Tribunal directed the TPO to allow working capital adjustments as per law while conducting the fresh comparability analysis.

                          4. Proportionate Adjustment for International Transactions:
                          The appellant argued that the TP adjustment should be proportionate to its international transactions, not extending to domestic transactions. The Tribunal, referencing the Delhi High Court's judgment in CIT vs. Keihin Panalfa Ltd., accepted this principle and directed the TPO to restrict the adjustment to international transactions only.

                          5. Calculation of Operating Margins:
                          The appellant contended that the TPO erred in computing operating margins for both the appellant and the comparables. The Tribunal restored this issue to the TPO for reevaluation, directing the TPO to consider the appellant's submissions and evidence.

                          6. Disallowance of Royalty:
                          The TPO disallowed 25% of the royalty payment, considering it capital in nature. However, the Tribunal noted that this issue was already settled in favor of the appellant by the Delhi High Court in CIT vs. Denso India Ltd., which held that the royalty payment was revenue expenditure. Therefore, the Tribunal directed the deletion of this disallowance.

                          7. Disallowance of Provision for Bad and Doubtful Debts:
                          The appellant's additional objections regarding the disallowance of Rs. 22,34,415 for bad and doubtful debts were not considered by the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP). The Tribunal restored this issue to the DRP for reconsideration, directing the DRP to pass a speaking order after considering the appellant's objections.

                          Conclusion:
                          The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, with specific directions for the TPO and DRP to reconsider various issues, ensuring due consideration of the appellant's submissions and evidence. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a reasoned order and proper analysis in the selection of comparables, working capital adjustments, and the computation of operating margins.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found