Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the consideration received from sale of software products to Indian customers was taxable as royalty under section 9(1)(vi) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and Article 13 of the India-UK DTAA, or constituted business income not chargeable to tax in India in the absence of a permanent establishment.
Analysis: The software was supplied under distributor and end-user arrangements on a principal-to-principal basis. The contracts did not transfer copyright rights to the customers; they only permitted use of copyrighted software products. The treaty definition of royalty was held to control the tax treatment, and the domestic-law amendments to section 9(1)(vi) were held not to alter the DTAA position for the years in question. The receipts were therefore treated as consideration for sale of copyrighted articles and, in the absence of a permanent establishment in India, as business income not taxable in India.
Conclusion: The software receipts were not taxable as royalty and were not chargeable to tax in India as business income; the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: For a software payment to be taxable as royalty under the DTAA, there must be transfer of copyright rights or a right to use copyright, and mere supply of copyrighted software on restricted licence terms does not amount to royalty; domestic-law amendments cannot enlarge the treaty meaning absent corresponding treaty amendment.