Incidental waste from edible oil refining is not excisable goods and may qualify for the waste exemption.

Waste or refuse generated incidentally during the refining of edible oil is not treated as excisable manufactured goods merely because it has market value. The Tribunal applied the settled principle that incidental value does not determine excisability, and treated spend earth sludge as residue arising in the manufacturing process rather than a manufactured final product or by-product. On that basis, the residue was regarded as outside the charge of excise and covered by the exemption for waste under Notification No. 89/95-CE, so duty on spend earth sludge was not sustainable.

---

---

Issues: Whether spend earth sludge arising during manufacture of refined edible oil was liable to excise duty, or was covered by the exemption available to waste under Notification No. 89/95-CE.

Analysis: The Tribunal followed the settled view that the market value of an incidental product is not determinative of whether it is a manufactured excisable product. In the refining process, unwanted materials are removed to obtain refined oil, and the residue generated in that process is in the nature of waste arising during manufacture rather than a manufactured final product or by-product. On that basis, such waste was treated as outside the charge of excise and as falling within the exemption notification relied upon by the assessee.

Conclusion: The demand of duty on spend earth sludge was not sustainable and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the appeal was allowed, with the waste arising from refining held not liable to the demanded excise duty.

Ratio Decidendi: Waste or refuse arising incidentally in the course of manufacture is not treated as excisable manufactured goods merely because it may fetch a market value, and such waste is eligible for the exemption applicable to waste under the notification.

---