Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported glazed/polished porcelain tiles satisfied the conditions of the anti-dumping duty exemption notifications by being manufactured by the specified manufacturer, and whether the assessee was liable to anti-dumping duty, confiscation, redemption fine and penalty.
Analysis: The documentary record, including the import documents, bill of lading, certificate of origin and certificates from the manufacturing and exporting companies, showed that the goods were manufactured by the specified manufacturer and exported by the specified exporter. Mere reliance on internet verification of the brand name embossed on the tiles, without further investigation or corroboration, was held insufficient to displace the documentary evidence. The fact that the brand belonged to another company in the same group did not establish that the goods were not manufactured by the specified manufacturer. The statement of the assessee's officer was treated as only factual and not an admission of the Revenue's allegation.
Conclusion: The exemption conditions were held to be satisfied, and the demand of anti-dumping duty was not sustained. The confiscation, redemption fine and penalty were set aside in the assessee's appeal, while the Revenue's appeal was dismissed.