Customs Broker License Revocation Overturned; Rs. 50,000 Penalty Upheld

The Tribunal set aside the revocation of the appellant's Customs Broker Licence for facilitating the clearance of mis-declared imported goods but upheld a penalty of Rs. 50,000 and forfeiture of the security deposit. The appellant's reliance on documents from an unauthorized source led to violations of regulations, including failure to verify goods' genuineness and advise on necessary certifications. Despite finding the appellant guilty of various breaches, the Tribunal deemed the initial revocation too severe, opting for a lesser penalty instead.

---

---

Issues: Revocation of Customs Broker Licence, Mis-declaration of imported goods, Violations of Regulations

Revocation of Customs Broker Licence:
The appeal was filed against the revocation of the appellant's Customs Broker Licence by the Commissioner of Customs, New Delhi. The appellant, a CHA, was accused of facilitating the clearance of imported goods declared as "Vinyl coated paper clip" but found to be Measuring Tape of "Zebra" brand without the necessary permission from the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS). The appellant argued innocence, claiming to have relied on documents provided by a freight forwarder. The Revenue justified the revocation, citing the appellant's failure to verify the imported goods' genuineness, leading to Anti-Dumping duty implications. The Tribunal found the appellant guilty of violations of various regulations but deemed the revocation of the licence as too harsh a punishment. Consequently, the revocation was set aside, and a penalty of Rs. 50,000 was upheld along with the forfeiture of the security deposit.

Mis-declaration of Imported Goods:
The appellant had filed a Bill of Entry declaring the goods as "Vinyl coated paper clip" but the actual goods were Measuring Tape of "Zebra" brand. The adjudicating authority held the appellant responsible for mis-declaration and facilitating the clearance of goods without proper verification. It was noted that the appellant failed to advise the client on customs regulations, including the requirement for BIS certification for importing Measuring Tape. The Customs Department found serious mis-declaration by the importer, with the appellant facilitating such actions, violating provisions of the Customs Act, Foreign Trade Regulation Act, and Legal Metrology Act, 2009.

Violations of Regulations:
The appellant was found guilty of violating Regulation 11(a), (b), and (d) of the CBLR by filing import documents without verifying KYC and relying on documents from an unauthorized source. The appellant's actions were deemed to have facilitated mis-declaration and attempted clearance of goods, breaching various legal provisions. Despite establishing violations during the enquiry, the Tribunal considered the revocation of the Customs Broker Licence as excessive and modified the impugned order, partially allowing the appeal by setting aside the revocation while upholding the penalty and forfeiture of the security deposit.

---