Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2018 (5) TMI 228 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal partially allows assessee's appeals for AY 2009-10 The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee's appeals, directing the Assessing Officer to verify and delete duplicate additions and confirming a minor ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Tribunal partially allows assessee's appeals for AY 2009-10

                            The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee's appeals, directing the Assessing Officer to verify and delete duplicate additions and confirming a minor addition for unexplained expenditure for AY 2009-10. The order was pronounced on February 08, 2018.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Sustainability of additions under sections 69/69A of the Income Tax Act.
                            2. Validity of the assessment based on material found during the search of a related party.
                            3. Applicability of sections 69 and 69A to the facts of the case.
                            4. Duplication in the calculation of unexplained expenditure.
                            5. Telescoping of surrendered income by partners against additions in the firm's case.
                            6. Unaccounted receipts and expenditures for the assessment year 2009-10.

                            Issue-Wise Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Sustainability of Additions under Sections 69/69A:
                            The primary issue in these appeals is the sustainability in law of the additions made under sections 69/69A of the Income Tax Act for unexplained expenditure. For AY 2007-08, the addition was Rs. 9.92 lacs, and for AY 2009-10, it was Rs. 6.10 lacs. The assessee, a partnership firm in civil construction, was assessed based on incriminating material found during a search at the premises of a related party.

                            2. Validity of the Assessment Based on Material Found During the Search of a Related Party:
                            The argument that no search was conducted at the assessee's premises or its partners was deemed inconsequential. The assessment was based on material found during the search of a related party, M/s. Khanna Pahwa Associates. The initiation of proceedings under section 153C was not under challenge, as the assessee’s counsel did not press Grounds 1 and 7 of the Appeal.

                            3. Applicability of Sections 69 and 69A to the Facts of the Case:
                            The assessee argued that sections 69 and 69A were not applicable. However, the Tribunal found that the expenditure on building materials and services, paid in cash and not recorded in the books, clearly fell under section 69A. The section deems unexplained money, bullion, or valuable articles as income if not satisfactorily explained. Alternatively, section 69C, which deals with unexplained expenditure, could also apply. The Tribunal emphasized that the exercise of power should be referable to a jurisdiction that confers validity upon it.

                            4. Duplication in the Calculation of Unexplained Expenditure:
                            The assessee claimed duplication in the calculation of unexplained expenditure. The Tribunal found merit in this argument. The assessee demonstrated that some cash expenditures were included twice, both from the account of the expenditure and the vendor. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer (AO) to verify and delete the addition to the extent of duplication and cash payments made after March 31, 2007.

                            5. Telescoping of Surrendered Income by Partners Against Additions in the Firm's Case:
                            The assessee argued for telescoping the surrendered income of Rs. 54 lacs by the partners against the firm's additions. The Tribunal rejected this argument, noting that the income referred to by the partners was for AY 2009-10 and could not be available during AY 2007-08.

                            6. Unaccounted Receipts and Expenditures for the Assessment Year 2009-10:
                            For AY 2009-10, the addition was based on unaccounted receipts and expenditures. The AO added Rs. 6.10 lacs as the difference between the unaccounted receipt of Rs. 12.15 lacs and unexplained expenditure of Rs. 6.10 lacs. However, the Tribunal found that the same document showed a loss of Rs. 2.59 lacs on the Anil Seth project and a total loss of Rs. 1.71 lacs when considering another project. The Tribunal directed the deletion of the addition except for Rs. 11,660/- related to three documents with dates post-26.06.2008, which were confirmed as unexplained expenditure.

                            Conclusion:
                            The assessee's appeals were partly allowed. The Tribunal directed the AO to verify and delete the duplicate additions and confirmed a minor addition for unexplained expenditure for AY 2009-10. The order was pronounced in the open Court on February 08, 2018.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found