Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether composite works contracts executed during the period prior to 1.6.2007 were liable to service tax and whether the demand could survive after denial of abatement under Notification No. 15/2004-ST dated 10.06.2004.
Analysis: The contracts in dispute were composite in nature, involving supply of materials as well as labour, and the record showed payment of VAT on such work orders. Since the period involved was July 2005 to September 2006, i.e. prior to 1.6.2007, the legal position laid down by the Supreme Court on the taxability of composite works contracts governed the dispute. On that basis, such contracts could not be subjected to service tax for the relevant period, and the demand founded on denial of abatement was unsustainable.
Conclusion: The demand was not legally sustainable and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief.