Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether recovery proceedings for agricultural income-tax were barred by limitation and whether the notice could still sustain threatened penalty proceedings.
Analysis: The statutory bar under section 41(4) prevents commencement of recovery proceedings after the prescribed period calculated from the latest date fixed for payment in the notice of demand, or, where appeal proceedings are involved, from the date on which the appeal is decided. On the facts, the recovery action was beyond time and therefore could not be sustained. The judgment also noted that no provision was shown which imposed any embargo on initiation of penalty proceedings after a specified time from assessment.
Conclusion: The notice was quashed to the extent it sought recovery by revenue recovery proceedings, but it was not quashed insofar as it threatened penalty proceedings.