Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the requirement in section 80-0 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, that the Central Government's approval of the agreement with the foreign company be obtained before 1 October of the relevant assessment year was mandatory or directory, and whether approval granted after that date but with retrospective effect for the assessment year entitled the assessee to deduction.
Analysis: The provision was enacted to grant relief in respect of income from qualifying foreign technical collaboration agreements, while ensuring governmental approval of the agreement itself. The Court distinguished between the requirement of approval and the time by which approval had to be granted. It held that the statute did not expressly require that the approval be accorded before 1 October, and that such a reading would add words not found in the text. The assessee had applied within time and could not control administrative delay. Applying the object of the provision, the Court treated the timing requirement as directory and viewed the later amendment as clarificatory of the original legislative intent.
Conclusion: The approval obtained after 1 October, but made effective from the relevant assessment year, satisfied the statutory requirement, and the assessee was entitled to deduction under section 80-0.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a statutory approval provision is enacted to confer relief and the assessee has complied with the application requirement, the time for governmental approval may be construed as directory rather than mandatory if strict insistence on the date would defeat the object of the enactment and the approval is made effective for the relevant year.