Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to a writ directing rectification of the assessment under section 35 after the period mentioned in the provision had expired, where the request for rectification had been made within time.
Analysis: Section 35 imposed a duty on the Income-tax Officer to rectify a mistake brought to his notice by the assessee within the prescribed period. The assessee had applied for rectification before expiry of the period applicable to the firm's assessment, but the officer failed to act. The limitation in the provision governed the commencement of proceedings and did not authorise the officer to defeat the assessee's right by inaction. A public authority cannot rely on its own default to deny relief, and mandamus may issue to compel performance of a statutory public duty even after the time fixed for doing the duty has passed.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to a direction for rectification, and the writ petitions succeeded.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an assessee seeks rectification within the statutory period and the authority fails to perform the imposed public duty, the expiry of the period does not bar a writ directing compliance with the duty.