Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal Upholds Customs Decision on Confiscated Smuggled Goods, Imposes Penalties</h1> <h3>Abhijit Sutradhar, Deep Agencies, Medico Pharma, Vishal Medical Agency, Pharma Sales, Frontier Stories Versus Commr. of Customs, Central Excise & Service Tax-Siliguri</h3> The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Customs' decision to confiscate the smuggled Phensedyl Cough Linctus and Recodex Cough Syrup, along with imposing ... Mis-declaration of export goods - Smuggling - Phensedyl Cough Linctus were packed inside the Cartoons under mis-declaration of Potatoes - N/N. 35/2008-Custom (N.T.) dated 02.04.2008 - Held that: - the appellant s herein are acting on behalf of the Syndicate of smuggling of Phensedyl Cough Linctus and Recodex Cough Syrup - there are no reasons to interfere with the Order of the Adjudicating authority - appeal dismissed - decided against appellant. Issues: Smuggling of Phensedyl Cough Linctus and Recodex Cough Syrup, Confiscation of goods, Imposition of penalties, Role of various parties, Adjudicating authority's findingsSmuggling of Phensedyl Cough Linctus and Recodex Cough Syrup:The case involved the interception of vehicles loaded with goods declared as Potatoes but found to contain Phensedyl Cough Linctus under mis-declaration. The DRI Officers seized the goods with the belief that they were meant for illegal export to Bangladesh. The Commissioner of Customs confiscated the goods and imposed penalties on various parties under the Customs Act, 1962.Confiscation of goods and Imposition of penalties:The Commissioner of Customs, Central Excise, and Service Tax, Siliguri Commissionerate, confiscated the bottles of Phensedyl Cough Linctus and Recodex Cough Syrup, along with the carrier trucks and bags used for concealment. Penalties were imposed on individuals involved in the smuggling operation under various sections of the Customs Act, 1962.Role of various parties:The appellant, a registered trader of medicine, claimed innocence and argued that they were not involved in any illegal activities. The manufacturer provided details of the batches supplied to different locations. The Adjudicating Authority found that several parties, including carriers, occupants of trucks, and distributors, were knowingly involved in smuggling the restricted Cough Syrup under the guise of transporting potatoes.Adjudicating authority's findings:The Adjudicating Authority detailed the involvement of different parties in the smuggling operation, including abetting the smugglers, preparing false documents, and enhancing business through fraudulent practices. The authority held various parties liable for strict penal action under Section 114(i) of the Customs Act, 1962, and recommended prosecution under Section 135 for their involvement in smuggling activities.In conclusion, the Tribunal upheld the impugned Order, rejecting all appeals filed by the appellants and disposing of stay applications and cross objections. The judgment highlighted the detailed findings of the Adjudicating Authority regarding the roles played by different parties in the smuggling of Phensedyl Cough Linctus and Recodex Cough Syrup, emphasizing strict penal actions under the Customs Act, 1962.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found