Appellate tribunal allows Cenvat credit for turnkey services, overturns denial The appellate tribunal found that the appellant was providing services of erection, commissioning, and installation on a turnkey basis, procuring ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Appellate tribunal allows Cenvat credit for turnkey services, overturns denial
The appellate tribunal found that the appellant was providing services of erection, commissioning, and installation on a turnkey basis, procuring materials for these services, and not engaged in trading activities. The denial of Cenvat credit was deemed unnecessary, and the appellant was allowed to avail the credit for services used in their projects. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief.
Issues: Proportionate Cenvat credit denial for trading activity.
Analysis: The appellant, engaged in manufacturing and providing services of erection, commissioning, and installation of transmission tower line projects, faced denial of Cenvat credit due to alleged trading activity. The appellant procured materials from manufacturing units and the open market for these services. A show cause notice was issued invoking extended limitation for the period Jan. 2008 to March 2011. The denial of Cenvat credit was based on the perception that the appellant engaged in trading activities. The appellant contended that they were involved in turnkey projects, not trading, and thus no Cenvat credit reversal was necessary. Additionally, they argued that trading activities were exempted from service tax effective from 1.4.2011, a period post the notice issuance. The appellant sought to set aside the impugned order.
The appellate tribunal considered both parties' submissions and found that the appellant was indeed engaged in providing services of erection, commissioning, and installation on a turnkey basis, procuring materials for the same purpose. It was established that the appellant was a service provider and not involved in trading activities. Consequently, the show cause notice alleging trading activity was deemed unnecessary and set aside. The tribunal concluded that the appellant rightfully availed Cenvat credit for services used in providing erection, commissioning, and installation services. As a result, the impugned order was found to lack merit and was set aside. The appeal was allowed with any consequential relief.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
