Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the demand of service tax and penalty could be sustained in full when part of the receipts related to the period prior to levy of service tax and the assessee had shown payment of tax on the post-levy receipts.
Analysis: The receipts were examined against the period of levy of service tax on commercial training and coaching services from 1.7.2003. The material on record showed that an identifiable portion of the collections related to the pre-levy period and was therefore not taxable. The department had not verified the details produced by the assessee, and the demand based on the pre-1.7.2003 receipts was not sustainable. The balance receipts after 1.7.2003, on which tax had already been deposited, were accepted.
Conclusion: The demand of tax of Rs.6,507/- and the penalty were set aside, while the balance tax of Rs.13,903/- was upheld.