TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) whether cash sales and bank deposits arising from trading transactions could be added separately as unexplained cash credits under section 68 after rejection of books of account and estimation of profit under section 145(3); (ii) whether the assessee was entitled to deduction under Chapter VIA on the basis of evidence to be produced before the Assessing Officer.
Issue (i): whether cash sales and bank deposits arising from trading transactions could be added separately as unexplained cash credits under section 68 after rejection of books of account and estimation of profit under section 145(3)
Analysis: The assessee's cash sales were treated by the Assessing Officer as unproved trading entries, while the books were simultaneously rejected and profit was estimated. The additions thus arose from the same trading receipts. Once the turnover was subjected to estimation of profit after rejection of books, the same receipts could not again be brought to tax as unexplained cash credits. However, the rejection of books and estimation of income remained justified, and the profit rate required reasonable estimation.
Conclusion: The addition under section 68 was deleted. The rejection of books was upheld, but the gross profit was to be recomputed at 5%.
Issue (ii): whether the assessee was entitled to deduction under Chapter VIA on the basis of evidence to be produced before the Assessing Officer
Analysis: The claim was not finally rejected on merits. The matter depended on verification of supporting evidence, which the assessee was to furnish before the Assessing Officer for examination in accordance with law.
Conclusion: The Assessing Officer was directed to verify the evidence and allow the deduction, if admissible in law.
Final Conclusion: The assessee succeeded on the section 68 addition, while the estimated profit addition was retained at a reduced rate and the deduction claim was restored for verification, resulting in only partial relief.
Ratio Decidendi: Where receipts arise from trading transactions and the books are rejected with income estimated on gross profit, the same receipts cannot again be assessed separately as unexplained cash credits.
TaxTMI 
