Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an appeal against an adjudication order passed by a Deputy Director of Enforcement lay directly to the Appellate Tribunal for Foreign Exchange, or whether the proper forum was the Special Director (Appeals) under the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999.
Analysis: The appeal forum was held to be governed by the statutory scheme of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999. Section 17 provides an appeal to the Special Director (Appeals) against orders of an Adjudicating Authority being an Assistant Director or Deputy Director of Enforcement, while Section 19 permits appeals to the Appellate Tribunal only in cases other than those covered by Section 17(1). The forum of appeal was treated as a matter of procedure, and the earlier law on repeal and saving was applied to hold that, even where the cause of action arose under the repealed regime, the appeal had to be pursued before the forum created by the repealing statute. On that construction, a direct appeal to the Tribunal was not competent.
Conclusion: The appeal was not maintainable before the Appellate Tribunal for Foreign Exchange and ought to have been filed before the Special Director (Appeals); the appeal was therefore dismissed.