Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Cenvat credit was required to be reversed under Rule 11(3) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 in respect of finished goods lying in stock on the date the assessee crossed the SSI exemption threshold and resumed exempted clearances.
Analysis: The goods were manufactured from inputs procured over different periods, and the record showed that the quantity of finished goods lying in stock on 31.03.2013 could not have been wholly manufactured from inputs purchased only during the duty-paid period. The credit attributable to inputs lying in stock as on 17.12.2012 had already been reversed under Rule 11(2), while the credit embedded in inputs procured thereafter and used in goods remaining in stock on 31.03.2013 was recoverable under Rule 11(3). On that basis, the demand and interest were found to be legally sustainable.
Conclusion: The demand for reversal of Cenvat credit was upheld and the appeal failed.