Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Deputy Commissioner could exercise suo motu revisional power under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 in respect of an assessment made under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 by virtue of Section 9(2) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956.
Analysis: Section 9(2) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 authorises the State sales tax authorities to assess, reassess, collect and enforce tax under the Central Act and, for that purpose, to exercise the powers available to them under the general sales tax law of the State. The Court noted that a Division Bench had already held that revisional power under the State sales tax law could be invoked in relation to an assessment under the Central Sales Tax Act in view of this statutory framework. On that basis, the challenge that Section 56 of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 could not be used for revision of a Central Sales Tax assessment was rejected.
Conclusion: The Deputy Commissioner had jurisdiction to invoke revisional power under Section 56 of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 in respect of the assessment under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, and the writ petition failed.