Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to abatement of duty for the period of factory closure under the Pan Masala Packing Machine (Capacity Determination and Collection of Duty) Rules, 2008 when the continuous period of machine inoperation extended to 15 days but the claim was made only for the days falling within the relevant month.
Analysis: Rule 10 permits abatement where the machines remain inoperative continuously for not less than 15 days. The relevant test is the continuity and length of closure, not whether the entire qualifying period falls within a single calendar month. Where the assessee had already deposited duty for the whole month and the machinery remained closed for the qualifying continuous period, abatement could be granted for the proportionate days falling in that month. The earlier view that the closure spanned only part of the month did not defeat entitlement, because the statutory condition was continuous inoperation for 15 days or more.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to abatement of duty, and the allowance of the claim was upheld.