Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under section 271C of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was exigible for short deduction of tax at source on brand fee paid under the brewing agreement, and whether the assessee had shown reasonable cause under section 273B of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The payment was found, on the terms of the brewing agreement, to be consideration for use of brand name and trademarks and therefore in the nature of royalty attracting tax deduction at source under section 194J of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and not a mere contractual payment under section 194C of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The assessee failed to place tangible material showing that it had any reasonable basis to treat the payment differently. The plea of bona fide belief was rejected because the agreement itself described the payment as brand fee and there was no factual foundation for treating it as payment for contract work. The assessee also failed to discharge the burden of proving reasonable cause under section 273B of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Conclusion: Penalty under section 271C of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was upheld and the appeals were dismissed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where tax is short-deducted on a payment correctly characterised as royalty, penalty under section 271C follows unless the assessee proves reasonable cause under section 273B.