Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the penalties imposed for non-payment of service tax on GTA freight were sustainable when the assessee claimed bona fide belief based on Notification No. 34/2004-ST and no suppression of facts was established.
Analysis: The assessee had not discharged service tax on freight amounts within the exemption limit, but the records showed that the transactions were duly reflected in the books of account. The Tribunal accepted that the assessee had acted under a mistaken interpretation of the notification and had been paying tax where freight exceeded the stated limit. In these circumstances, the conduct did not justify a finding of suppression of facts with intent to evade tax, and the penal provisions were not attracted.
Conclusion: The penalties were set aside. The demand of service tax was left undisturbed.