Micronutrient fertilizer classification upheld for EDTA FE; absence of contrary evidence defeated the Revenue's challenge.

EDTA FE was held classifiable as a micronutrient fertilizer under Heading 3105 90 90 after the product was examined against the test report, the Fertilizer Control Order, 1985, and Chapter Note 6 to Chapter 31. The Tribunal accepted the lower authorities' finding that micronutrient fertilizers may contain elements such as zinc, iron, manganese and copper for plant growth, and that the presence of nitrogen did not by itself disqualify the goods from fertilizer classification. As the Revenue produced no supporting test report or expert opinion to displace those concurrent findings, and a prior decision on a similar product supported the same view, the classification was upheld and the Revenue's appeal failed.

---

---

Issues: Whether the imported product EDTA FE was correctly classified as a micronutrient fertilizer under Heading 3105 90 90, and whether the Revenue had shown any basis to disturb the concurrent findings of the lower authorities.

Analysis: The product was examined in the light of the test report, the Fertilizer Control Order, 1985, and Chapter Note 6 to Chapter 31. The lower authorities had found that micronutrient fertilizers include elements such as zinc, iron, manganese and copper for plant growth, and that the presence of nitrogen was not decisive against classification as fertilizer. The Revenue's objection rested only on the premise that nitrogen was incidental and that the goods were more appropriately classifiable as an organic chemical under Chapter 29. No supporting test report or expert opinion was produced to displace the factual findings already recorded. The earlier Tribunal decision on a similar product also supported classification under Heading 3105.

Conclusion: The classification under Heading 3105 90 90 was upheld and the Revenue's appeal failed.

---