Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the writ appeal challenging the pre-assessment notice could be entertained when the assessee had not attended the personal hearing and the matter was still at the pre-assessment stage.
Analysis: The appellant had filed objections to the pre-assessment proposal and was afforded an opportunity of personal hearing, but did not avail it. The challenge was directed against a pre-revision or pre-assessment notice, and the Court found no ground to interfere with the view that such a challenge was premature. The Court also found no error or infirmity in the order dismissing the writ petition on that ground. At the same time, to ensure that the objections were considered, directions were issued for a fresh notice of personal hearing and for disposal of the objections on merits in accordance with law.
Conclusion: The writ appeal was not entertained on merits and the dismissal of the writ petition as premature was upheld. The matter was sent back only for a fresh personal hearing and consideration of the objections by the assessing authority.
Ratio Decidendi: A writ challenge to a pre-assessment notice is ordinarily premature when the assessee has an available opportunity to participate in the statutory assessment process, including personal hearing, and the authority must first be allowed to decide the objections on merits.