Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was liable to be allowed by setting aside the arbitral award granting interest on the withheld sum of Rs. 1,88,08,233/-.
Analysis: The withheld amount had been retained by the petitioner after adjustment of its own dues, on the plea of apprehended tax liability. The contractual clauses relied upon by the petitioner required the respondent to indemnify it for liabilities arising from the transaction, but they did not confer any right to retain the respondent's admitted dues indefinitely merely on anticipation of a possible tax burden. The record also showed that the tax dispute had arisen from a typographical error in the transaction documents and that the withholding had continued despite repeated demands for release of the balance amount. In these circumstances, the arbitral tribunal was justified in granting interest on the retained sum.
Conclusion: The challenge under Section 34 failed and the arbitral award was upheld in favour of the respondent.
Ratio Decidendi: In the absence of a contractual right to retain admitted dues, a party cannot withhold payment indefinitely on a mere apprehension of liability and may be made liable to pay interest on the withheld amount.