Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a notice under section 148 issued beyond four years from the end of the relevant assessment year was invalid for want of approval under section 151(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, where the original assessment had been completed by the Assessing Officer.
Analysis: The provision was examined in light of the amendments to section 151 and the administrative circular explaining the revised scheme. The language of the proviso was held capable of more than one construction, but the interpretation adopting a prior approval requirement was preferred. The reasoning emphasized that, for reassessment beyond four years, a higher-level satisfaction must be recorded before issuance of notice under section 148, and that this safeguard applies even where the assessment was framed by a Deputy Commissioner or Assistant Commissioner. The construction also maintained parity between scrutiny and non-scrutiny assessments and avoided a disconnect in the statutory scheme.
Conclusion: The notice was held to be invalid without the requisite approval under section 151(1), and the answer to the question of law was against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee.