Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2018 (1) TMI 1238 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tax Penalties Upheld for A.Ys 2007-08 & 2008-09, Set Aside for A.Y 2009-10 Due to Improper Notice The Tribunal upheld penalties under Section 271(1)(c) for A.Ys 2007-08 and 2008-09, as the substantive addition was confirmed and no appeal was made. ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Tax Penalties Upheld for A.Ys 2007-08 & 2008-09, Set Aside for A.Y 2009-10 Due to Improper Notice

                            The Tribunal upheld penalties under Section 271(1)(c) for A.Ys 2007-08 and 2008-09, as the substantive addition was confirmed and no appeal was made. However, the penalty under Section 271AAA for A.Y 2009-10 was set aside due to improper notice issuance. The Tribunal deemed the notice under Section 271(1)(c) valid, rejecting the argument of improper notice and lack of jurisdiction. The decision highlighted the necessity of distinct notices for different penalties and clarified the applicability of protective assessments in penalty cases. The order was issued on 25th January 2018.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) for A.Ys 2007-08 and 2008-09.
                            2. Penalty levied under Section 271AAA for A.Y 2009-10.
                            3. Validity of notice under Section 271(1)(c).
                            4. Applicability of case laws on protective assessments and penalties.
                            5. Additional grounds of appeal regarding improper notice and jurisdiction.

                            Issue-Wise Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) for A.Ys 2007-08 and 2008-09:
                            The assessee challenged the penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for A.Ys 2007-08 and 2008-09. The Assessing Officer (AO) initiated penalty proceedings based on receipts found during a search operation, which were treated as unaccounted income. The CIT (A) confirmed the substantive addition in the assessee’s hands, leading to the penalty. The Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)'s decision, noting that the substantive addition had become final as the assessee did not appeal against it.

                            2. Penalty levied under Section 271AAA for A.Y 2009-10:
                            For A.Y 2009-10, the penalty was levied under Section 271AAA. The assessee argued that the notice for penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was issued, but the penalty was levied under Section 271AAA without issuing a separate notice. The Tribunal agreed with the assessee, stating that separate notices are required for penalties under different sections. Therefore, the penalty order for A.Y 2009-10 was set aside.

                            3. Validity of notice under Section 271(1)(c):
                            The assessee contended that the notice under Section 271(1)(c) was invalid as the AO did not strike off inappropriate words, making it unclear whether the penalty was for concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars. The Tribunal found that the notice was issued for both defaults, and since both conditions were present, there was no need to strike off any part of the notice. Thus, the notice was deemed valid.

                            4. Applicability of case laws on protective assessments and penalties:
                            The assessee relied on various case laws to argue that penalties cannot be initiated on protective assessments. The Tribunal distinguished these cases, noting that in the present case, the substantive addition was confirmed in the assessee's hands, making the protective assessment irrelevant. The Tribunal cited several judgments, including those from the Calcutta High Court and Gujarat High Court, to support its decision that penalties can be levied when the substantive addition is confirmed.

                            5. Additional grounds of appeal regarding improper notice and jurisdiction:
                            The assessee raised additional grounds that the notice under Section 271(1)(c) was improper and that the AO lacked jurisdiction. The Tribunal examined the notice and found it valid, as it was issued for both concealment and furnishing inaccurate particulars. The Tribunal also noted that the AO was satisfied about the defaults during the assessment proceedings, justifying the initiation of penalty proceedings.

                            Conclusion:
                            The Tribunal dismissed the appeals for A.Ys 2007-08 and 2008-09, upholding the penalties under Section 271(1)(c). For A.Y 2009-10, the Tribunal set aside the penalty under Section 271AAA due to the lack of a separate notice. The decision emphasized the importance of proper notice and the distinction between protective and substantive assessments in penalty proceedings. The order was pronounced in open court on 25th January 2018.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found