Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the show cause notice issued under Regulation 20(1) of the Customs Broker Licensing Regulations, 2013 was barred by limitation for having been issued beyond ninety days from the date of receipt of the offence report, and whether the consequential suspension order could survive.
Analysis: The regulation prescribed issuance of notice within ninety days from the date of receipt of an offence report. The Court followed its earlier coordinate bench decisions holding the time limit to be mandatory and sacrosanct. It accepted that the suspension and earlier prohibition action were founded on the relevant investigation/offence report, and held that the later show cause notice was issued after expiry of the prescribed period. The proposed amendment definition of offence report was also treated as supporting the same construction. The challenge was accepted on limitation and the notice was quashed on that technical ground alone.
Conclusion: The show cause notice under Regulation 20(1) was held to be time-barred and invalid, and the order confirming suspension became ineffective and infructuous.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the Customs Broker Licensing Regulations prescribe a notice to be issued within a fixed period from receipt of the offence report, that time limit is mandatory and breach of it renders the proceedings void.